Thursday, February 14, 2008

Timothy Kemp denied entrance into Mr. Lyndon competition

2/14/08

Nate Champagne featuring Timothy Kemp

For anyone that picked up an issue of the Critic last week, I’m sure you saw the front page with its picture of Mr. Lyndon. What few know is the story going on behind Mr. Lyndon. The CAB sanctioned event went off without a hitch crowning Dave Marks for his lip-syncing and beat-boxing skills. Though, it is the story of Timothy Kemp who was not allowed to participate that this article will focus on.

For those who don’t know, Timmy Kemp is an outstanding individual with a 2.6 GPA, involved in many clubs and even writes for this paper. Even though Timmy Kemp went to all the meetings and jumped through all the hoops to compete in the Mr. Lyndon competition he still received an email the night before the competition telling him he did not meet the criteria to compete. He has since received no such written criteria by which one could determine eligibility.

“I felt discriminated against when I found out that I was replaced by someone who showed up ten minutes before show time,” Kemp said. “The contest cannot be considered legitimate because not everyone who wanted got to compete”.

After meeting with RHD Brandon Buckley, Timmy was told that due to events in the Grey House in years past, Brandon had decided that Timmy to be too accessible to peer pressure to let him compete. Buckley continued to say that at first there were too many people interested in competing but by the time the show rolled around there were few competitors to be found. However, a friend and Mr. Lyndon presenter Christopher Arsenault has come forth in saying, “Brandon didn’t want Timmy competing because he took his shirt off at the talent show.” Though if this is truly the reason behind Kemp’s dismissal from the competition then it raises the question, if we can sell chocolate penises and vaginas for Valentines Day why can’t we deal to see Timmy with his shirt off?

Reasoning aside, the manner in which it was handled and inquiries into it were met with hostility and insult. Considering our tuition is what pays for the dorms and the jobs of the people that run them, I feel as though we deserve better answers then what I got from Brandon Buckley and Jonathan Davis and I quote, “It’s none of your business.” Well, we’re making it our business.

Moments Like These: Searching for Home

2/14/08

By Trish Pennypacker
Critic Columnist


I was born a Vermonter but my roots lie neither here nor there. For the first twelve years of my life I lived in the same house. but alternated between public, Christian, and home school. When I hit puberty my dad hit a religious high: fanatical most people would call it. ”Cultish,” my grandmother said. Up went my hair behind a head covering. Down went the hemline on my handmade skirts. Out came my tender roots from the native soil.

It was 1987. My father and a few like-minded men were revolting against governmental and religious authority. High on biblical interpretation and disgusted with world greed they began to question their existence. “Lay not up for yourself treasures upon earth. Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body what ye shall put on. For your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of these things,” or so Matthew 6 says. And thus my world changed.

My father gave up his business first, then electricity, our furniture, our house, our cars, and all but essential belongings. Nothing prepared me for this “simpler” kind of life, but with blind faith I drifted down the Eastern seacoast, rolled with the stern tide of subordination, an ephemeral moonbeam between child and woman. Of which purpose I didn’t understand.

People called us gypsies. And so we were. Pale, blue-eyed misfits traveling in a caravan of buses, sneaking glances through faded curtains at the grey, vast modern world: big hair and acid washed jeans, leather bomber jackets and knit miniskirts. But we were the merchants cast into the sea. We had given up materialism for the spiritual life, although it was sometimes hidden behind flea market jockeys, apron pockets jingling with change and banana boxes full of wares to sell. In time the smell of asphalt erased memories of fresh lilac blossoms in the New England air; the booming voices of vendors overshadowed the somber sounds of preachers, although each were skilled in the trade of deceit.

And so it went. Mile after mile across the United States, green hills turned to red dust in a blank horizon; swamplands held the tide brackish, rancid and still; the thick desperation of the overgrown inland left me homesick before endless tall-grass prairies bowed to hard mountains. I was nothing but a pod-less milkweed, a spur-less sandspur, a tumbleweed in the wind.

But somewhere in the endless knot of landscape, beyond the symbolic skirts and head coverings (Yes! We are God’s people!) the exoteric meant nothing. The slow possession the earth took upon my soul could not be measured by distance. That a consecrated beauty beyond the flaws of humanity exists, and I became aware of such beauty, was more inspiring than the Scriptures.

For years I hid this revelation. All of it. There was no forgiveness for falling to my knees at the glory of a sunset, or realizing that the hawk had more meaning to his flight than our own exodus as upside-down birds, eyes on a heaven. But my own heaven was shuffled into the dust from which all life begins and ends. I paid my reverence to purple mountains and restless prairie, a multi-colored and unparalleled sanctuary.

I wish I could say that my father found his peace beyond the endless highway; that shedding the need for authority and materialism gave him the key to Paradise. But this is not true. My father was ultimately a provider, and his God could only provide insomuch as my father himself could provide. Many of my father’s questions went unanswered. To him, who had surrendered so much, this was the ultimate failure. That my father questioned was not his sin. As Barbara Kingsolver says, “Questioning our government’s actions does not violate the principles of liberty, equality, and freedom of speech; it exercises them and by exercise we grow stronger.”

Inadvertently, this truth was borne out. Years on the road took its toll on my family. Faith was singularly important; tested endlessly it was forgotten. And grief that extended beyond the earth was imparted on a man without a home, without answers, without faith. The same furtive quest that weakened my father’s spirit expanded and strengthened my own. My wild longing to belong somewhere faded. I had as much right to belong to any one place as the tumbleweed. The earth is not mine to have, to possess, and yet my roots so long ago uprooted, have flourished like tillandsia.

Certainly time has turned the whispers, stares, and misunderstandings of my nomadic life to insignificance, the harsh realities of the world to wonders. In the great misty air of living I come back to Vermont. For within a great part of me, Vermont is the place I call home.

The Three Count : WWE No Way Out Predictions

2/14/08

By Timothy Kemp
Critic Columnist


On Sunday, February 17, World Wrestling Entertainment will be presenting its tenth annual No Way Out pay-per-view from the Thomas and Mack Center in Las Vegas, Nevada. Since this is a major stop on the road to WrestleMania 24, I would like to share my predictions on how I would like to see the event turn out.

Career Threatening Match: “Nature Boy” Ric Flair vs. Mr. Kennedy
A couple months ago, Mr. McMahon put an ultimatum on the legendary Ric Flair saying that the next match that he loses will be his last one. Flair has had a career a little over thirty-five years, and with all the new and younger competitors gunning for him, I can’t see him overcoming Mr. Kennedy. Unless Ric can lock in his patented figure-four leg lock, I’m going with Kennedy for the win. If this contest does end up retiring Ric Flair, I hope that WWE does give him one more match at WrestleMania. I believe that would be a great way to build up their biggest event of the year.
Winner – Mr. Kennedy

ECW Championship Match: Chavo Guerrero vs. CM Punk
CM Punk was blatantly robbed out of his title when Edge speared him in his match against Chavo a couple weeks ago. I think that it was a fluke that Chavo won the ECW Championship, and CM Punk is ready and hungry to get back on top. I hope Punk’s win will lead into a match with a certain ECW Original that I believe deserves one more opportunity at the championship at WrestleMania.
Winner – CM Punk

Raw Elimination Chamber Match: Winner Faces WWE Champion at WrestleMania: Chris Jericho vs. JBL vs. Shawn Michaels vs. Jeff Hardy vs. Triple H vs. Umaga
I have witnessed an elimination chamber match at a pay-per-view a couple years ago in Albany, New York, and I can tell you that this is a large, sadistic looking structure. I personally hope that Jeff Hardy wins this match, because over that last few months, he has really stepped up to main event status. With an exception of a five-year hiatus, he has been working for the WWE since the early 1990s and finally he is ready to be a world champion. I am going with the “rainbow-haired warrior” for the win.
Winner – Jeff Hardy

Smackdown Elimination Chamber: Winner Faces World Champion at WrestleMania: Batista vs. Undertaker vs. The Great Khali vs. Big Daddy V vs. MVP vs. Finlay
Some people may think that having two chamber matches in one night is too match, but if TNA can have an entire pay-per-view of steel cage matches, what is wrong with this? I am going to pick Undertaker for the win, because he was cheated out of his title back in May by Edge. If Edge is also victorious in his match, I hope ‘Taker makes him “Rest In Peace.” Either way the outcomes go, I’m sure both chamber matches will be brutal, because when human flesh meets steel platforms, chains and glass, it will not be pretty.
Winner - Undertaker

World Heavyweight Championship: Edge vs. Rey Mysterio
There is no question that I am a huge fan of Rey Mysterio. For a guy that is only 5’6 and 175 pounds, he is certainly the “biggest little man” in the WWE. When he won his first world title at WrestleMania 22, I couldn’t have been happier. There are some that think he is not a “believable” champion, which I think is crazy. The man was never given an opportunity at main event status by any other company he worked for previously, and I’m glad WWE had allowed him to be a huge star. I am pulling for Rey-Rey, and maybe we will see a Mysterio/Undertaker match at ‘Mania.
Winner – Rey Mysterio

WWE Championship: Randy Orton vs. John Cena
John Cena has cashed in his opportunity to be in the main event at WrestleMania, for a chance to get his hands on Randy Orton at No Way Out. Back in October, Cena never lost his title, as he tore his pectoral muscle, forcing him to relinquish the championship. I am in no way a Cena hater; however I am going to go with a victory for Orton. I think that Randy Orton has really stepped up his game when WWE lost their biggest star in Cena. He deserves a main event spot at WrestleMania, and I hope it be a rematch against Jeff Hardy. If John Cena does end up winning, it would not bother me one bit.
Winner – Randy Orton

Letter to the Editor

2/13/08

As we all are well aware of, the campus’ non-smoking policy is now very well established. Many smokers can be seen on the fringes of the student parking lots indulging in their selected habit. There is something about this that troubles me. I feel that forcing people to exclusively smoke in the parking lot is a violation of that person’s right to treat their body as their own.

I understand that smoking vs. not smoking is not defined by our constitution; I do believe however, that the men who wrote it (many with pipes in hand) would agree that if it is not harming anyone besides the individual smoking, there shouldn’t be a problem. Those who run the country evidently agree because smoking has not been completely condemned by local governments (although many have banned it within the confines of public buildings). This brings to light the reasonability of not allowing smoking in restaurants, classrooms, and public entrances. There should be, however, places for students to go that is easily accessible on campus. These places should be understood as places where people can go to smoke; people therefore will be able to avoid the offense of having to smell or walkthrough someone’s secondhand smoke.

This is indeed the way it was before. Smokers were not heading to the rules, however, so the powers that be decided to go with plan B. This is unfair for those who did obey the rules; it is a classic case of punishing a large number for a small number’s infractions. There should be some way to keep smokers to their allotted areas without banishing them from the grounds. If people decided to do something about that problems, then a happy medium could be found. Those who would smoke in the areas where it was prohibited would be well aware of the existing penalty for such an act, and would possibly think it wiser to smoke within the reasonable areas provided for them.

This ban could also produce some directly negative effects on the campus itself. One is that some students, who chose to smoke between classes, may be late for those classes which follow their break. I understand that this is their choice, but people’s work places oftentimes allow smoke breaks, and those places are paying them to be their. If students are paying money, under the impression that they will be able to smoke on campus, then they should be allowed to do so. This leads to the next problem. Those of us who enrolled in this college were under the impression that we could smoke on the grounds when we decided to sign our promissory notes. I’m not saying that this affected my decision to come here (I commute). I do remember when I selected a college fresh out of high school, under the impression that I would be living there. I know, then, that I would not have gone to a college where I couldn’t step out of my dorm and have a cigarette. I would not have expected to be able to smoke in the dorms (out of respect for those who oppose); I would have expected a place where I would be allowed to do so, however (out of reciprocated respect). This decision may indeed prove ill for those students who are looking for a place to enjoy their college experience.

Scott Richard

Letter to the Editor

2/13/08

Dear Editor,

I recently was reading an article in your paper entitled “‘Ally’ what is it and who are they?.” I found it quite informative, considering its length. Though why I am writing is in response to one sentence in the article. “Unfortunately, the only way for new faculty to find out about Ally is through word of mouth.” I consider this quite a problem for many reasons. One reason is the Ally program is for members of the faculty, staff, and the Lyndon State community at large to have understanding and trained people to talk to individuals struggling with Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and/or Transgender issues. It is also formed to distinguish members of the community that are willing to talk with others to help advise them in most needing of times. Though the problem I have with this is that whenever I see a sign posted on a door around campus, I don’t know whom that person is and might not be inclined to ask around in fear of embarrassing myself. So what I would like to propose is that someone in the community or the people involved in this program make it more well known and present themselves as “Allies” in the community. This would thereby incline members of the community to take advantage of this program as well as promote newer members of the community to consider being involved themselves.

Thanks,
Micheal Hannan

Dear John: Heels are irrelevant

2/13/08

By Riché Pinchingpenny
Critic Columnist


I want to talk about apparel. Those hastily shed piles of disgust before a big date, an important interview, an encounter with an ex. Nothing seems to fit when I want it to, but shoes never let me down. I love high heels. I am not a tall woman. I wear them for height dammit! But a guy ruined high heels for me. He loves the way my ass sways when I walk in heels. He foams at the mouth when my boots peek out from the hem of my jeans. My god, you’d have thought I’d flashed a boob! Oh, I suppose I can see the attraction in a pair of heels: curves, smoothness, danger. Better yet, no opinions or emotions. But how would he feel if I only noticed the bulge in his pants; based his entire worth on a few wobbly inches?

This guy isn’t my lover. I don’t give a damn what he thinks about my body. That he’s suddenly made me self-conscious of my body is the shame. “It’s for the best,” I grumble, slipping my feet into a pair of sneakers; he won’t leer at me today.

For the best… Sonofabitch! I’m doing it again. It was “for the best” when my ex told me to lose a few pounds; it was “for the best” when he brought hard-core porn into the bedroom. “Come on Baby. Try to act like you enjoy it.” (Don’t get me wrong, I love erotica. Watching women grimace while blinking back eyefuls of cum? Turn on Jeopardy.) Maybe if I got a better job, took more time off, and giggled more it would also be for the best. I dumped the man. Who needs the shit?

Being single, I found something admirable: I like my perfectly imperfect self. I like the way my body moves, soft under my own fingertips, slow and unrushed; I like wine more than beer, the Yankees more than the Red Sox; it’s ok to be lazy on Sunday mornings; and I can stack a neat cord of firewood. Heels are irrelevant.

Thursday, February 7, 2008

Holy Sheet: Sexy back

2/7/08

By Jordan Royer
Sex Columnist


If sex is a keep-it-in-the-bedroom topic, then why is it that everything these days has some sort of sexual connotation or appearance? I mean, LSC is known by some because of our huge ice penis.

Maybe I am just perverted, I won’t argue there, but I know I am not the only one that thinks some of the things I think. Like that new vibrating face cleaner pad. Take it in the shower and it helps with scrubbing and such. Right, like I am the only one that thought that was a multi-task took right there. Why don’t you just come out and say it in the advertising- want to buy a sexual stimulator but you are too embarrassed? Here, wash yourself with this little vibrating do-hicky, *wink, wink*.

Sexual innuendos are everywhere. In the kitchen-- beat until stiff-- On instructions -- screw tightly, add lubricant if necessary. Or one of my favorites -- be careful not to puncture the nipple--. I mean, with all these being said/read all around me, how can I not constantly be thinking about sex? I mean, baseball is about the only other thing I think about, but maybe that’s because chicks dig the long ball.

My last point is a little different, but still a lot the same. “You two are like two peas in a pod.” Heard that before? Yeah, me too. But let’s be serious now, how many times to you pop open a pea pod and see just two peas in there? Pretty much whenever I have fresh peas from the garden there are like three or four peas in that pod. Telling us something? Hmm. How am I supposed to think about that special someone to share my pod with when there is room for two or three more? Like I said, I won’t argue that I am a little perverted.

Position of the week- The bumble bee (or Hornet for those with school spirit)

Ankle Grabbers

2/7/08

By Trish Pennypacker
Special to the Critic


In a quiet corner booth at a local diner, I sip my coffee slowly while my daughter chats with my mother. Ever since my father died a little over a year ago, my Mom and I have been meeting for lunch a couple times a month. This is a big deal. Conversation with my mother isn’t easy. But this past year has done to my resentment and understanding what sunlight does to blue jeans on a clothesline: faded and softened. In many ways, I see her differently now. She no longer seems as dependent and clingy, stuck completely within a shell I don’t understand. She is bravely becoming independent, trying to move beyond her sorrows. Our conversations have gotten deeper. Today, especially, I notice an extra softening of her features.

Pushing her food aside, Mom leans onto the table, glancing around before confessing she is considering dating again. With giddiness she tells me about a man she’s interested in. I laugh as she tries to imagine him in my place: a table between them, casual dinner, conversation. Not an easy task for a woman who hasn’t dated in 34 years. “What if I can’t date? What if I compare every man to your father?” She sits back and shudders, a mixture of fear and excitement. Taking a deep breath, I try to reassure her that the beauty of life consists in not knowing what to expect. Everything will be ok.

She smiles as she watches my daughter munch ketchup soggy fries. “You used to be just like her,” she reflects. Ha! Me: the child of defiance and dreams, the child that believed tigers lived under the bed and could be tamed with coaxing. As stubborn and dreamy as I used to be, I doubt any other child would be as entertainingly inquisitive and bold as my daughter.

I look at my daughter, her deep green-brown eyes intent on the couple seated in the next booth. “Where do you come from?” she asks them, not caring that the man’s face is hidden beneath a black mop of a beard. The man mumbles something. The woman smiles weakly. Not the friendliest of couples. My daughter doesn’t care; they are new to her. I think she’ll never stop quizzing them but in the middle of rapid questions, the crayons on the table grab her attention. She wants to draw monsters.

Monsters have always fascinated and never frightened her. One of my favorite snapshots was taken the Halloween she was almost eight months old. In the middle of an ogre, a pirate, and Frankenstein sat my smiling baby-witch. Two years later, trying to explain that a four-legged Rover might bite just encourages her to sigh “but Mom” as she coos “nice doggy” to the Mastiff on the street. Someday she’ll have more fear; it’s just her age, I try to convince myself. But after a long noisy slurp of her chocolate milk, she disappears beneath the table to look for Ankle Grabbers. They are, after all, under everything.

I turn my attention back to my mother, noticing her voice has taken a deeper tone. She’s worried about running out of wood and oil. I sympathize. I moan about rising prices and keeping the kids fed. She talks about loneliness, the family. “Did you know your grandfather’s not doing well?” she asks. “The doctor prescribed him sleeping pills. Mostly for anxiety since he’s afraid to sleep. Doesn’t think he’ll wake up.”

I wonder how he must feel having outlived a son. I feel sorry for him, painfully so, but my youth (and my exhaustion from raising the daughter staving off Ankle Grabbers) keeps me from fully grasping a fear of sleep, the limits of time. I am young enough to still believe in hope and future. As Annie Dillard says, “We teach our children one thing only, as we were taught: to wake up.” I never feel fear for very long, for I’m too busy being amused by my daughter’s tall tales, each day anticipating what wondrous thing she’ll do next. Still, when I assure my daughter there are no such things as Ankle Grabbers, am I telling her the truth?

Maybe not. Maybe the Ankle Grabbers of a toddler’s world manifest themselves later into too high gas prices and soaring mortgage rates, awkward dates, the end of a marriage, the stress of an academic exam, a job interview, doctors’ appointments, sleeplessness, depression, old age. That a global truth lurks in the unknown may be at the heart of our fears. To fear to the extent that I no longer find even the slightest joy in life is worst, to me, than death itself.

My mother continues talking hopefully about the future. I ask for a refill of coffee and laugh as my mother shrieks when cold hands wrap around her ankle. “Don’t move,” my daughter says. “I’ll scare the Ankle Grabbers away.”

The Three Count: WWE No Way Out Predictions

2/7/08

By Timothy Kemp
Special to the Critic


On Sunday, February 17, World Wrestling Entertainment will be presenting its tenth annual No Way Out pay-per-view from the Thomas and Mack Center in Las Vegas, Nevada. Since this is a major stop on the road to WrestleMania 24, I would like to share my predictions on how I would like to see the event turn out.

Career Threatening Match: “Nature Boy” Ric Flair vs. Mr. Kennedy
A couple months ago, Mr. McMahon put an ultimatum on the legendary Ric Flair saying that the next match that he loses will be his last one. Flair has had a career a little over thirty-five years, and with all the new and younger competitors gunning for him, I can’t see him overcoming Mr. Kennedy. Unless Ric can lock in his patented figure-four leg lock, I’m going with Kennedy for the win. If this contest does end up retiring Ric Flair, I hope that WWE does give him one more match at WrestleMania. I believe that would be a great way to build up their biggest event of the year.
Winner – Mr. Kennedy

ECW Championship Match: Chavo Guerrero vs. CM Punk
CM Punk was blatantly robbed out of his title when Edge speared him in his match against Chavo a couple weeks ago. I think that it was a fluke that Chavo won the ECW Championship, and CM Punk is ready and hungry to get back on top. I hope Punk’s win will lead into a match with a certain ECW Original that I believe deserves one more opportunity at the championship at WrestleMania.
Winner – CM Punk

Raw Elimination Chamber Match: Winner Faces WWE Champion at WrestleMania: Chris Jericho vs. JBL vs. Shawn Michaels vs. Jeff Hardy vs. Triple H vs. Umaga
I have witnessed an elimination chamber match at a pay-per-view a couple years ago in Albany, New York, and I can tell you that this is a large, sadistic looking structure. I personally hope that Jeff Hardy wins this match, because over that last few months, he has really stepped up to main event status. With an exception of a five-year hiatus, he has been working for the WWE since the early 1990s and finally he is ready to be a world champion. I am going with the “rainbow-haired warrior” for the win.
Winner – Jeff Hardy

Smackdown Elimination Chamber: Winner Faces World Champion at WrestleMania: Batista vs. Undertaker vs. The Great Khali vs. Big Daddy V vs. MVP vs. Finlay
Some people may think that having two chamber matches in one night is too match, but if TNA can have an entire pay-per-view of steel cage matches, what is wrong with this? I am going to pick Undertaker for the win, because he was cheated out of his title back in May by Edge. If Edge is also victorious in his match, I hope ‘Taker makes him “Rest In Peace.” Either way the outcomes go, I’m sure both chamber matches will be brutal, because when human flesh meets steel platforms, chains and glass, it will not be pretty.
Winner - Undertaker

World Heavyweight Championship: Edge vs. Rey Mysterio
There is no question that I am a huge fan of Rey Mysterio. For a guy that is only 5’6 and 175 pounds, he is certainly the “biggest little man” in the WWE. When he won his first world title at WrestleMania 22, I couldn’t have been happier. There are some that think he is not a “believable” champion, which I think is crazy. The man was never given an opportunity at main event status by any other company he worked for previously, and I’m glad WWE had allowed him to be a huge star. I am pulling for Rey-Rey, and maybe we will see a Mysterio/Undertaker match at ‘Mania.
Winner – Rey Mysterio

WWE Championship: Randy Orton vs. John Cena
John Cena has cashed in his opportunity to be in the main event at WrestleMania, for a chance to get his hands on Randy Orton at No Way Out. Back in October, Cena never lost his title, as he tore his pectoral muscle, forcing him to relinquish the championship. I am in no way a Cena hater; however I am going to go with a victory for Orton. I think that Randy Orton has really stepped up his game when WWE lost their biggest star in Cena. He deserves a main event spot at WrestleMania, and I hope it be a rematch against Jeff Hardy. If John Cena does end up winning, it would not bother me one bit.
Winner – Randy Orton